1335 Dublin Road, Suite 104D, Columbus, Ohio 43215
FREE INITIAL CONSULTATION 614-488-2053 FREE INITIAL CONSULTATION 614-488-2053

U.S. Supreme Court Tightens The Standard In Employment Discrimination Retaliation Claims

In a recent decision, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, the U.S. Supreme Court made it more difficult for plaintiffs to claim retaliation for filing complaints of employment discrimination. The court ruled that plaintiffs must prove retaliation was the determinative factor in an employer’s adverse employment action — and not just a motivating factor, as had been the previous standard.

Retaliation in Ohio

State and federal law prohibit employers from taking adverse employment action against individuals for filing discrimination complaints, participating in a discrimination proceeding or opposing discrimination at work. Examples of adverse employment actions that employers use to dissuade individuals from filing complaints include:

  • Threats
  • Unjustified disciplinary actions
  • Firing
  • Refusal to hire
  • Promotion denial
  • Increased surveillance
  • Elements of a retaliation complaint

When filing a claim for retaliation in Ohio, you must show that you engaged in an activity protected by law, your employer took an adverse action and there was direct nexus between the protected activity and the adverse action. Protected activities, according to Ohio law, include filing a claim or assisting in the submission of a claim of discrimination or participating in the investigation of a complaint of discrimination based on one of the legally protected categories.

Significance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s new standard

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said that retaliation cases should have a stricter standard than regular employment discrimination cases. Typically, employers are held liable when illegal differential treatment was a motivating factor. Now, claimants have to meet a “but-for causation standard” — were it not for the plaintiff’s protected activity, the employer would not have taken the adverse action. Justice Kennedy also reasoned that a tougher standard is needed to dissuade the growing number of retaliation cases filed.

If you suspect that you were the victim of an adverse employment action because you exercised your legal right to file a discrimination complaint, contact experienced Columbus employment law attorneys today.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

X

Contact Form

We will respond to your inquiry in a timely fashion. Thank you.

Quick Contact Form